The BDE - GC War OOC Thread
Posts: 4291
  • Posted On: Mar 27 2006 11:58am
Well, it's called the "Ongoing" adventures of Dolash, so in a way, you could say it never finished because at any minute I might decide to have further adventures, then start posting in it again, but certainly that plot arc came to a conclusion.
Posts: 2915
  • Posted On: Mar 27 2006 1:26pm
I thought we agreed it was just Kamon...
Posts: 4025
  • Posted On: Mar 27 2006 4:28pm
That we did.
Posts: 4291
  • Posted On: Mar 27 2006 8:04pm
I remember nothing of such deals, nor was that what happened in the thread. In fact, I kind of got the impression you guys were just tired of it and said "Fine! Just finish the thread and stop bothering us."

As is, the thread involves quite a large exodus of prisoners, such as POWs, political prisoners, and so forth - I got the impression that that was what was in the super secret underground prison place (kind of like Guantanamo Bay, if all the jokes people make about the Bush administration sending critics there turned out to be true.).
Posts: 2915
  • Posted On: Mar 27 2006 8:13pm
I remember quite explicitly saying only Kamon... you launched a small invasion on the largest defended prision in the galaxy... even the Empire doesnt have anything more protected... Not becuase of the prison itself, but becuase the Death Star Equivalent is next door so the entire area of space was under lockdown. It was an abuse of the Characters cant die rule for you to fly in and except not to be blasted to hell in the first place, but I aquieced in all good faith to let you grab the ONE PRISONER... let alone not strand you on the rock with Kamon...

I let you get away with bullshit and you want to wave it around in my face later?
Posts: 4291
  • Posted On: Mar 27 2006 9:33pm
I can't find anything detailing such a deal, nor can I remember it. However, my AIM logs do cut off near that period of time (I switched computers and the logs didn't come with me) so what you're reffering to may be there.

Also, for the record, I'm not waving anything in your face - I'm dealing with Kyric. Kyric seems entirely capable of discussing his own issues, and sure, I see no logical reason why you couldn't too as a co-leader of the group alongside Kyric, but it's important just to underline that I'm not dealing specifically with you right now.

To address your concerns, the thread was not done through abuse of that rule, although such a statement is a common defence hurled up the instant an individual tries to accomplish something without 3 to 1 fleet superiority. In fact, if I recall, you washed your hands of the whole thing early on and left it for me and Chardoc to finish, then later just me.

I will bow to no such shouted demands from you, Heir. I'm not dropping fifty tonnes of nuclear waste on your planet in one move, nor hurling the ultimate unstoppable bioweapon from hyperspace to infection in seconds, nor even seizing critically important information in a single dash from space to your home city and back again. You have a tendency to find fault with things long after they have occured if they presently provide you with a disadvantage that is starting to rub against my nerves, when I have oft been told that a common rule is that if you don't contest something when it happened, or shortly therafter, then it has happened - within reason, of course, but it would be unreasonable to demand going back to and overhauling a thread which you had issue with from long ago because now you see that 'letting' something slide was more detriminal than you'd expected.

If I come off as annoyed, then forgive me, but it's really starting to appear as though you take fault with everything I do simply because I do it.
Posts: 5387
  • Posted On: Mar 27 2006 11:27pm
Heir didn't raise the previous issue to which you alude, as you well know, and was unaware of it until I brought it to his attention, because it was entirely unreasonable and illegal move on your part to BS yourself a technical gain.

So don't say Heir has a "tendency" to take issues with things. He's taken issue with two things, one of which he didn't even raise and only mentioned because it was brought up by somebody else.
Posts: 4291
  • Posted On: Mar 27 2006 11:48pm
My apologies, that was a bit of an overreaction on my part.
Posts: 699
  • Posted On: Mar 28 2006 4:52pm
I'll post a reply sometime before Friday.
Posts: 2453
  • Posted On: Mar 29 2006 8:07pm
About the Mon Cal thread:

We have faced BDE and Farfalen technology before. We have been hit from far ranges before. We would have a good idea of your weapon's range. We would have enough sense to form up out of range of your extended ranged guns.