So the capture was then illegitimate? Instead of going on all that, why don't we simply just say that Ralen can rescue me now since the capture wasn't even technically legal in the first place?
As An FYI, Mr./Ms. Drayson
So the capture was then illegitimate? Instead of going on all that, why don't we simply just say that Ralen can rescue me now since the capture wasn't even technically legal in the first place?
No, Joren. The capture was no "illegitimate". You failed to respond to or contest the actions leading to your capture.
Your fault.
Your fault.
Question, out of curiousity then, supposing you said you were going to kill my char and I did not contest or respond to it because of RL issues or OOC issues.
Would you then be allowed to kill my character?
Would you then be allowed to kill my character?
It's not against the rules to take someone's character into captivity.
Bad example.
Bad example.
No, he would not.
Under no circumstances would that be allowed.
A capture however is a slightly more shady issue. As cheap as it may be, it wasn't technically illegitimate. Had you complained, and they had said too bad, it would be another issue.
If you wish to be freed, you know how to get in touch with TNO, and I have made an offer to contact them on your behalf if you so desire.
But now that you're captured I am not going to go back and uncapture. I am more in the vein of righting a wrong then going back and telling the wrong that it never happened and no one wants it, sending it off to go on his computer where he has no friends because he is a wrong, and everyone else is right.
:(
:(
Sorry, what was I saying again?
Oh yeah, talk to TNO.
Offical ruling still stands.
Under no circumstances would that be allowed.
A capture however is a slightly more shady issue. As cheap as it may be, it wasn't technically illegitimate. Had you complained, and they had said too bad, it would be another issue.
If you wish to be freed, you know how to get in touch with TNO, and I have made an offer to contact them on your behalf if you so desire.
But now that you're captured I am not going to go back and uncapture. I am more in the vein of righting a wrong then going back and telling the wrong that it never happened and no one wants it, sending it off to go on his computer where he has no friends because he is a wrong, and everyone else is right.
:(
:(
Sorry, what was I saying again?
Oh yeah, talk to TNO.
Offical ruling still stands.
Ahnk seems to disagree with that little assessment. It seems taking me without consent IS against the rules as it falls under the "altering" or "changing" of the character rule.
Therefore, good example.
In that case, Drayson I'll drop you a PM, I want to get this resolved and out of the way.
Y'know, Drayson, I am online, you and I could resolve this right now.
And Ahnk, I don't think he was saying uncapture him, I think he was saying that since he could not consent the capture, why doesn't he instead choose where the character is at?
And Ahnk, I don't think he was saying uncapture him, I think he was saying that since he could not consent the capture, why doesn't he instead choose where the character is at?
Well scratch that idea, lol, I had to sign off before he ever signed on.
The best bet is still to iron it out without TNO, to prevent further arguement.
That is the point, right?
Right.
I'm so smart.
That is the point, right?
Right.
I'm so smart.