That is still no grounds for hostility.

I am pointing out a part you may have missed in an attempt to assist you and Griff so that you both have a clearer understanding of what's going on. I'm not infallible, I am wrong in cases, but that does not mean you need to act hostily because I am offering up suggestions.

Again, I never supported or contested Griff's damages, I honestly don't care about your petty little dispute with one another. I'm simply offering up information for you two that you can BOTH utilize.

Instead of trying to run me into the ground as you do each other, you could per chance take this opportunity and try to use it to your own advantage.

Silence!



Now, was there something the Staff needs to see?

No. I am awaiting Drayson/Trachta's posts.

Again, I never supported or contested Griff's damages, I honestly don't care about your petty little dispute with one another. I'm simply offering up information for you two that you can BOTH utilize.

If that is your opinion Mr. Gevel, you are entitled to be incorrect.

And again, you have no place in this thread.

Because I present facts that may make your cases more difficult to defend or because you simply don't like me?

I'm not here to get into flame-fests with you Drayson, I'm here to present various facts and unbiased perspectives. Don't be so quick to try to assume that everyone here is against you.

If you are going to overlook things, I'll present them, partially so that should *I* ever fleet RP with you, these things will have been set in stone long before hand to prevent further complications.

As in the previous thread concerning Kas, don't refute me, refute my points.

Because your putting yourselves into threads that have nothing to do with you, constantly. Your pointing out irrevelent information, information taken entirely out of contex, information that has no useful ourpose, and attempting to apply it the situation.

Drayson, Trachta, I await your posts, and unless we are waiting for yet another Staff decision be advised I will take advantage of the 72 hr rule.

Good posts, guys. Just a few problems.

2 Bakura Destroyers Rendered Inoperable

This is highly unrealistic. Because if you can do this, then your shipyards would have been destroyed long ago. This was the first post of anyone firing on these ships, and your entire fleet was not firing on them, because you delt other insane damages to lots of other ships.

However, if you assure me that you will take two more posts until these ships are destroyed, I will let the matter lie.

ASD Praetor Destroyed

This of course is realistic and I have no problems over it. Howeverm, both you and Trachta posted an ASD destroyed. Unfortunately, there is only one ASD present at the battle, so only one has been destroyed.

All ORS forces are now caught in tractor beams and unable to do anything but spin on their axis.

Unfortunately, this is completely untrue. It takes an entiere Death Star's complement of tractor beams to be able to ensare even one Star Destroyer.

You have no Death Star and therefore cannot do this to sixteen ships. '

Shields are down due to the size of the missile volley directed at each.

Shields down on every single ship, eh?

Your gunners must have extrordinary good aim. Unfortunately, this is not true since none of my ships are caught in a tractor beam, and all of my ships are underneath the shipyards.

Oh and Hapan Battle Dragons have no missiles.

Again, I am willing to overlook this as long as I have assurance that these ships will not be destroyed for two posts.
(Two of YOUR posts, not you and Trachta's combined)