Ow!
I think James might have something to say about that.
By and large, they did conduct their habitation in what you might call and "illegal" fashion. Of course, the First Nations by and large did not have any word for "legal" or otherwise. But I'm pretty sure they didn't much vibe with the rape, disease, and pillaging in general.
There was a Government. Many of them, most of them autonomus from one another. And each of these tribes existed, by and large, in better harmony with one another and nature far better then the aforementioned immigrants. Mind you, with the debate raging in the anthropological community about our current misconceptions about how the pre-Columbian First Nations lived, it's possible that these peoples were, in many respects, far more advanced then their Spanish, French, Norse, Blah, Blah, Blah, counterparts.
There wasn't a Bill of Rights, but that dosen't mean that these people did not understand basic human necessity. And "law" was well established, just not in the context that we generally understand it to be now.
Without representation of law legality does not exist.
Anyway. Sorry for the topic burn.
I think James might have something to say about that.
By and large, they did conduct their habitation in what you might call and "illegal" fashion. Of course, the First Nations by and large did not have any word for "legal" or otherwise. But I'm pretty sure they didn't much vibe with the rape, disease, and pillaging in general.
There was a Government. Many of them, most of them autonomus from one another. And each of these tribes existed, by and large, in better harmony with one another and nature far better then the aforementioned immigrants. Mind you, with the debate raging in the anthropological community about our current misconceptions about how the pre-Columbian First Nations lived, it's possible that these peoples were, in many respects, far more advanced then their Spanish, French, Norse, Blah, Blah, Blah, counterparts.
There wasn't a Bill of Rights, but that dosen't mean that these people did not understand basic human necessity. And "law" was well established, just not in the context that we generally understand it to be now.
Without representation of law legality does not exist.
Anyway. Sorry for the topic burn.