-
Posted On:
Feb 12 2004 12:22am
just a Death Star and and Eclipse/Soviergn rules change idea...
Req. Planets...
DS: 35 Planets needed to construct, 10 seems to low a number...
Sov: 15 Worlds... 7 is a bit low as well
Eclipse: 20 worlds... it was the most powerful 'ship' of the empire...
-
Posted On:
Feb 12 2004 12:29am
Which would put a DS out of range for any group currently other than TNO... I'm all for it...
-
Posted On:
Feb 12 2004 12:31am
it actually makes sense when you think about it logically, even though TNO has no desire to build one...
-
Posted On:
Feb 12 2004 1:01am
I'm not sure about the Eclipse and Sovereign thing, but I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea to require a massive amount of territory to support DS construction. Maybe not 35, but 10 seems really small, nowadays.
-
Posted On:
Feb 12 2004 1:09am
Objection.
I want to build a Death Star with 3 planets.
We should decrease the amount of nesscessary planets.
-
Posted On:
Feb 12 2004 1:13am
Yes! We should! 1 Planet per death star. Build time: 1,400 days.
-
Posted On:
Feb 12 2004 1:31am
Ahnk that's cool with me as long as I can get one too... and by "me" I don't mean TNO... I mean my own personal Death Star...