Now that both sides have thrown the required amount of mud, we can cease the flaming.

To be fair, only your side has been mud slinging. Until now.

I was waiting for you to get on and start flaming before I stopped it.

So far, Kas, you and Andra have done all the flaming in this thread. Don't give me this "I was waiting for you to start flaming" bullshit - because it's obvious that you're responding (not in kind) because my "flames" happen to not support your Conservative ideals. Whereas someone like Andra may call Dolash, me, and anyone else who is a fan of Michael Moore "ignorant" (which is simply a nicer-sounding word for idiot), when I reply to challenge the Conservative Gods, I get slapped with a bullshit excuse and an insult.

My advice to you would be to grow up and accept that there are people who disagree with you. You can't change that.

So, I should ban both of you then? Andra for flaming people on her first posts, and you for flaming without reading the thread first?

Wow, Kas. Another statement made on baeless assumptions and bred (from all indications) of a fear to face anyone who disagrees with you in a real debate. Because (judging by what I've seen), I do not do like you, and make my posts on an assumption of what other people have done. For example, your assumption that I haven't read this thread (which I have done, and I must wonder where that came from). And, for example, your assumption that I would "get on and start flaming", which didn't happen.

In fact, the flaming I've seen in this thread goes in this order:

Andra
You
Me

So maybe you should save us the trouble of dealing with your repeat arguments and ban yourself for flaming, and flaming on an assumption.

Just a suggestion. Another one would be to avoid defending your cause through your staff position. Saying "so, should I ban you then?" is, straight and true, banning someone who disagrees with you because he disagrees with you.


Andra... I should hope that you don't bare any irregard to me or TRF for what's been said and done. You do seem like a mostly sensible person, though if I may say so myself largely uninformed. That being said, it is good that you have an opinion, whatever it may be, because far to many people today simply don't care.

Welcome to TRF.

The best part about TRF is that we keep our arguments from getting personal. Right? We don't get angry at EACH OTHER, we get angry at the IDEOLOGIES, ok?

Isstal, your claim that I have been flaming would be better served if you quoted my flame.

Drumroll.....

I only posted this because the article may be edited in the future, and I want a record of this.

Implying that Moore would edit his article, which would clearly mean he was untrustworthy.

If there was a contract saying distrobution, I have little doubt that Moore would have waved it everywhere eight weeks ago.

Implying that Moore would have run around yelling "I told you so!", which in your eyes is clearly not right.

Now that both sides have thrown the required amount of mud, we can cease the flaming.

Insulting all sides, implying that we've been sniping at each other and flaming.

I was waiting for you to get on and start flaming before I stopped it.

That's a direct flame against me, ironically implying that I am a flamer and you rode in a white horse to stop it.

So, I should ban both of you then? Andra for flaming people on her first posts, and you for flaming without reading the thread first?

Threatening a ban, and again implying that I'm a rabid flamer and making baseless assumptions.

Isstal, your claim that I have been flaming would be better served if you quoted my flame.

This is ironic, because with the above quotes I can change one word and throw it right back in your face. Fun, no?


Hmm. That actually throws my order a little. But if you don't include the flaming of Michael Moore, then the order works (which is how it was based, since I don't think TRF takes into account the flaming of people who don't post here.)

Happy?