This thread is here to address to resolve agruments within this thread, which is getting mucked up in technicalties. Third person opinions about relevant topics in this thread are welcome. I will start by responding to Kach's latest PM.
I'm impressed that you're familar with the NIF database (I rped there). But it is correct; ships orbiting a planet move around at that speed because of gravity. You're not also taking into account that the camera is most likely moving in tandem with the ships so we can actually see them. This is also discussed in the link below.
Here's the link again If that does not work, here is the address: http://www.theforce.net/swtc/units.html#propulsion.
Show me.
While Telan and I were rping in "Tidings of War", we had a similar discussion. Then, Telan said that Imperial turbolasers really don't have any specific range. In any case, I fail to see how a TRF source trumps the others, as the other one is far more widespread and sponsored by George Lucas. As it is, we have just recently established that there is no standard turbolaser range at TRF. Thus, I suggest we have a moderator or moderators make an arbitiary decision on how this will be resolved.
If
I think we should start a thread to cover all of this.
See above.
Why? We have ships directly there scanning your vessels. There is no reason for us not to charge away as we see weapons pop up.
The Turning around part is true, though that would only add a few seconds which in turn is negated by us moving out already because of being forewarned by the ships scanning your vessel.
I'm going to point out that Havens have higher than normal shields for the size and that it is next to impossible for all of the weapons onboard a single ship to be able to target a single vessel that size.
Now the Deathsabers...
No, we don't. As I stated in the previous PM, I said they fled or they are escorting my ships as written within my post.
For the defensive value, I added up their shield and hull ratings. Those of the StarViper are at 50 SBD shields and 35 RU hull, as found in the NIF database; the link is
here. You'll have to scroll down to find it.
Thus, the defensive value for a StarViper is 85 while that of a Deathsaber is 150.
Your vessel is 14 DPF higher, which isn't much, considering that the ratings vary for starfighters from 60 DPF to 175 DPF.
Actually, it's been around at TRF for quite a while. Here's an example.
That is possible, but since they're moving away, I doubt you'll be able to hit it to the point of overwhelming shields, much less destruction.
I do not see anywhere within the Vendetta R&D references to abnormally powerful sensors with which to detect that. Even if they did, that doesn't explain why they can bypass the Vanish 2 sensor mask.
See above.
Actually, I have. I flew a Beechcraft with an instructor at EAA; and yes, I have played with flight simulators, notably XvT. Also, atmospheric flight is much different from space flight because of the existence of gravity within an atmosphere, which in turn dictates maneuvers.
How does that argument nullify the jammer? It also doesn't nullify the speed argument presented previously.
Thanks. I know that the heavy tractor beam range listed is a WEG stat. How can you use contradicting sources?
I'm impressed that you're familar with the NIF database (I rped there). But it is correct; ships orbiting a planet move around at that speed because of gravity. You're not also taking into account that the camera is most likely moving in tandem with the ships so we can actually see them. This is also discussed in the link below.
Here's the link again If that does not work, here is the address: http://www.theforce.net/swtc/units.html#propulsion.
Show me.
While Telan and I were rping in "Tidings of War", we had a similar discussion. Then, Telan said that Imperial turbolasers really don't have any specific range. In any case, I fail to see how a TRF source trumps the others, as the other one is far more widespread and sponsored by George Lucas. As it is, we have just recently established that there is no standard turbolaser range at TRF. Thus, I suggest we have a moderator or moderators make an arbitiary decision on how this will be resolved.
If
I think we should start a thread to cover all of this.
See above.
Why? We have ships directly there scanning your vessels. There is no reason for us not to charge away as we see weapons pop up.
The Turning around part is true, though that would only add a few seconds which in turn is negated by us moving out already because of being forewarned by the ships scanning your vessel.
I'm going to point out that Havens have higher than normal shields for the size and that it is next to impossible for all of the weapons onboard a single ship to be able to target a single vessel that size.
Now the Deathsabers...
No, we don't. As I stated in the previous PM, I said they fled or they are escorting my ships as written within my post.
For the defensive value, I added up their shield and hull ratings. Those of the StarViper are at 50 SBD shields and 35 RU hull, as found in the NIF database; the link is
here. You'll have to scroll down to find it.
Thus, the defensive value for a StarViper is 85 while that of a Deathsaber is 150.
Your vessel is 14 DPF higher, which isn't much, considering that the ratings vary for starfighters from 60 DPF to 175 DPF.
Actually, it's been around at TRF for quite a while. Here's an example.
That is possible, but since they're moving away, I doubt you'll be able to hit it to the point of overwhelming shields, much less destruction.
I do not see anywhere within the Vendetta R&D references to abnormally powerful sensors with which to detect that. Even if they did, that doesn't explain why they can bypass the Vanish 2 sensor mask.
See above.
Actually, I have. I flew a Beechcraft with an instructor at EAA; and yes, I have played with flight simulators, notably XvT. Also, atmospheric flight is much different from space flight because of the existence of gravity within an atmosphere, which in turn dictates maneuvers.
How does that argument nullify the jammer? It also doesn't nullify the speed argument presented previously.
Thanks. I know that the heavy tractor beam range listed is a WEG stat. How can you use contradicting sources?