Thats my Bush
Posts: 2915
  • Posted On: Mar 27 2006 3:23pm
Posts: 5711
  • Posted On: Mar 27 2006 10:02pm
Thats my Bush


Horrible awesome show, that.

"Less like a rocketship, more like a balloon."
Posts: 33
  • Posted On: Apr 7 2006 5:11pm
Why is it that the word flipflopper comes to mind
Posts: 2414
  • Posted On: Apr 7 2006 10:29pm
Why is that 9-11 comes to mind, evn? When that happened, things changed. It's not magic or anything like that. He didn't flip-flop. The world just changed.
Posts: 551
  • Posted On: Apr 7 2006 11:05pm
The world didn't change it just hit the US on the nose. The argument that Iraq supported terrorist groups involved them supporting them prior to 9/11. Saddam Hussein represented the same threat to the US both pre-9/11 and post-9/11 probably less post 9/11 since that reversed the decrease of military expenditures brought about by the end of the Cold War. It also gave Bush an excuse to implement things such as the Patriot Act which even if you may disagree with it, it does do some good. Nor would there be a Department of Homeland Security or increased security in airports etc. etc. The only difference was Bush needed something to do so he could look strong instead of Clinton's policy of bombing Iraq every once in a while.

But one does wonder, were it not for 9/11 what would Bush have done with those 4 years? Would he have invaded Iraq? Wasted his time and killed the US economy? Not gotten re-elected in '04? I'm voting for the last two and possibly all three.
Posts: 2414
  • Posted On: Apr 7 2006 11:12pm
*points out the fact that Bush himself did not kill the US economy*
Posts: 936
  • Posted On: Apr 8 2006 12:06am
September 11 was a godsend for bush. WIthout it he would have done nothing and gone down as one of those obscure presidents who didn't do anything bad or anyting good or anything at all (just like Van Buren)
Posts: 2414
  • Posted On: Apr 8 2006 12:08am
Probably would have been better than what he's doing right now. I like him and all, but I don't agree with the whole Iraq situation (I do say we can't pull out until they have a government and an army though). Personally, I think Iran and North Korea deserve more attention.
Posts: 936
  • Posted On: Apr 8 2006 12:18am
Of course it would be better than what he's doing now. A lazy, unspectacular presidnet is better than an overly ambitious one
Posts: 2414
  • Posted On: Apr 8 2006 1:22am
Sometimes it is. On occassion, and under certain circumstances, an overly ambitious president could potentially be a good thing.