Well, I for one won't change your mind about him because everyone is entitled to their own opinions which makes us human beings

I estimated that 98% of your posts... I just cant understand.

Okay o_O

I know this is off topic, but I'm curious... is English your first language, Nihilius? The syntax of your sentences seems jumbled.

English is my first language but I am also dyslexic that I have troubles with things like trying to saying something on my mind and onto paper or on the net.

that must be a real bitch.

MicroWord.

At least the way I see it, he has the mind of a child so something like getting sexual with a kid wouldn't even enter into his mind.

Children, even at ages as young as five years old, begin to experiment with sex amongst their friends. Its more prevalent in children ages 7, 8, and 9. It's natural that they explore their sexuality and many do so with their friends. This is a fact. Michael Jackson isn't an idiot, and yes, even with a mental capacity of say a five year old, he is more than capable of thinking about it and of getting sexual with little boys.

There have been too many accusations by different people for this to not be the least bit suspicious. If there had been only one, maybe two, children who accused him of this then I'd think the parents set the kids up in order to weasle money out of the guy. But with more than two coming forward over the years, I find it more than possible that the guy did commit these acts and is guilty.

Its not surprising that he got off. He has money, lots of it, and money speaks volumes in the courts. Sad, but true.

There is one thing I did find myself wondering when this first started though. Considering that he had been accused of this before, why would any parent in their right mind still allow their child to be around the guy in the first place? I think that the parents should have been on trial right alongside of Michael Jackson in this latest round through the courts.

you just keep raping those kids, and they just keep letting you get away with it.

Today, I just heard that Jackson's lawyer said on teletext here in New Zealand that Micheal will not have boys in his bed anymore because he didn't want to go through this again.

seriously though, all joking about mj and his rape festivals aside, a novel idea: none of you actually know if he is innocent or guilty because none of you were in the courtroom. this is one of those things where your "opinion" doesn't actually mean shit because it's entirely based on what you saw on nancy grace.

there are twelve people whose opinions on this are valid. none of them are you.

it's not that i think he's innocent or guilty, it's just sort of gay when vega is the only person who thinks there might be some leeway there and everyone else is getting their pitchfork and torch for the lynch mob.

maybe in the mind of a teenager who spends all his time on the internet multiple accusations are proof of guilt, but that's actually not how the courts work. the reason america has a legal system is precisely to prevent that sort of thinking -- the idea that if two or three people say someone is guilty, he is and you rape him with a two by four. it probably hasn't occured to any of you, but all it takes to make an accusation is a story. that's pretty easy stuff to make up.

maybe michael jackson rapes kids. maybe he is laughing all the way home in his stretch limousine right now with nine toddlers in the back. but there's also a chance that all of this is just a bad rap, in which case there may come a day all of you will feel pretty stupid. and i would assume that if tomorrow six of your neighbours who were tired of your dog shitting on their lawn accused you of raping their kids and the jury acquitted, you wouldn't appreciate everyone in america calling you guilty because, golly, how could six people be wrong?