Micheal Jackson Hate Goes Here
Posts: 2462
  • Posted On: Jun 14 2005 12:40am
He touches little boys... that's not wrong?
Posts: 383
  • Posted On: Jun 14 2005 1:13am
I've never seen any solid proof that he has touched any kids- Just the words of a few
Posts: 5387
  • Posted On: Jun 14 2005 1:16am
You didn't see the sketches of his penis?
Posts: 2462
  • Posted On: Jun 14 2005 1:27am
What do you want? Home movies?
Posts: 383
  • Posted On: Jun 14 2005 1:32am
I haven't seen the pictures but I have heard of them.

Obvioulsy I don't want home movies- All I'm saying is that I haven't seen anything that would suggest to me he did it. Maybe he did, maybe he didn't but it's not exactly something that can be changed now.
Posts: 2504
  • Posted On: Jun 14 2005 4:02am
I don't know, Kraken, he didn't exactly act like an innocent man by handing out hush money all over the place... when your innocent, you WANT your day in court...
Posts: 313
  • Posted On: Jun 14 2005 4:49am
Damalis is right and the fact that he showed up for court late, didn't dress properly and all around didn't act professional or like he cared didn't help it either. He knew he was getting off by paying them.
Posts: 254
  • Posted On: Jun 14 2005 4:57am
Probably acting like baby who needed his mommy to dress him?
Posts: 4025
  • Posted On: Jun 14 2005 5:03am
What really steams me is the after-trial jurors interview. Some of the women openly stated that they voted not guilty due to the conduct of the mother of the boys against them in the court room. Like her snapping her fingers at them. Ummm, hello, who is on trial here?
Posts: 5387
  • Posted On: Jun 14 2005 5:30am
The accuser is always on trial in a sexual assault case. Always.