o_O
o_O
Jay Z attacks female fan who wanted a photo
o_O
Doesn't look good does it. (understatement).
Taking devil's advocate for a moment, even if she's provoked him in some way, (which may be a possibility seeing as theres no sound), there is absolutley no justification for what he's done there!
Theres no doubt that its him, either. When I first started reading this thread, I thought it was going to be some dimly lit and poorly shot CCTV footage, but its totally clear, its definately Mr Carter. (obviously this is leaving aside the actual witnesses there).
Looks pretty cut and dry to me.
Assault I'd say.
Book him Dano!
Taking devil's advocate for a moment, even if she's provoked him in some way, (which may be a possibility seeing as theres no sound), there is absolutley no justification for what he's done there!
Theres no doubt that its him, either. When I first started reading this thread, I thought it was going to be some dimly lit and poorly shot CCTV footage, but its totally clear, its definately Mr Carter. (obviously this is leaving aside the actual witnesses there).
Looks pretty cut and dry to me.
Assault I'd say.
Book him Dano!
I felt stupider for reading the god-damned in character article... people cannot really talk like that.
But the picture really speaks for itself, and it's fairly big news that someone is stupid enough to push a camera into a girls eye when the guy standing behind her has a video camera. O_o
But the picture really speaks for itself, and it's fairly big news that someone is stupid enough to push a camera into a girls eye when the guy standing behind her has a video camera. O_o
True. It did seem like it was written by a 9 year old.
As for being stupid enough for doing it, I'd have to agree with you there.
He was obviously on crack, all these Rappers are you know, all of them are gun crazy crack addicts who swear a lot and call women bitches.
Its true, Ice-T told me yesterday when I had him round for Iced Tea.
As for being stupid enough for doing it, I'd have to agree with you there.
He was obviously on crack, all these Rappers are you know, all of them are gun crazy crack addicts who swear a lot and call women bitches.
Its true, Ice-T told me yesterday when I had him round for Iced Tea.
LOL!
Lmao
Given the information posted here (which will be the only information I take into account in this reply) this seriously looks like a case of "let's pick on the super-star".
Note the tone the supposed "journalist" has taken in his 'non-baised', and yet thuroughly opinionated article. Using terms like "Jiga-man", "backstage ballas" and, "peeps" denotes one of two things. Option one, this article appeared in some Hip-Hop rag where 'slang' is considered common tongue, or option two; the article was purposefully written to denerate 'rappers' and the like.
Also..
Note the authors use of the word "if", followed directly by what look to me to be a number of rather harmful accusations based on the aforementioned "if".
"Now, let’s look at this from the point of view of my former profession as a police officer and investigator…" - Sounds like motivation for bias to me...
"from those hazy lenses Jay-Z appears to have committed an unprovoked assault upon a defenseless female while others within in Jay’s entourage, security and backstage ballas watched and did nothing…this does not appear to be good."
Embellishment is a journalists favored tool, through and through. What evidence, in that clip, shows the female to be 'defenseless'? How can the author know that the supposed entourage 'watched and did nothing' when the clip is only just long enough to show the pair of shoves?
And again, a typical example of a writer shoving as many biased opinions into an article then following it up with a "what do you think?" tag line. As if the author even cares. Is there an explanation? Who cares, yours has already been given.
Another case of a little information being a dangerous thing.
Although, given that he is black, a rapper, and American, he probably did it. Not that I have any preconcived notions about any of the above.
Note the tone the supposed "journalist" has taken in his 'non-baised', and yet thuroughly opinionated article. Using terms like "Jiga-man", "backstage ballas" and, "peeps" denotes one of two things. Option one, this article appeared in some Hip-Hop rag where 'slang' is considered common tongue, or option two; the article was purposefully written to denerate 'rappers' and the like.
Also..
Note the authors use of the word "if", followed directly by what look to me to be a number of rather harmful accusations based on the aforementioned "if".
"Now, let’s look at this from the point of view of my former profession as a police officer and investigator…" - Sounds like motivation for bias to me...
"from those hazy lenses Jay-Z appears to have committed an unprovoked assault upon a defenseless female while others within in Jay’s entourage, security and backstage ballas watched and did nothing…this does not appear to be good."
Embellishment is a journalists favored tool, through and through. What evidence, in that clip, shows the female to be 'defenseless'? How can the author know that the supposed entourage 'watched and did nothing' when the clip is only just long enough to show the pair of shoves?
And again, a typical example of a writer shoving as many biased opinions into an article then following it up with a "what do you think?" tag line. As if the author even cares. Is there an explanation? Who cares, yours has already been given.
Another case of a little information being a dangerous thing.
Although, given that he is black, a rapper, and American, he probably did it. Not that I have any preconcived notions about any of the above.
It was from a rap mag. I edditted out a quote from one of Jay-Z's songs, but it was defenitely a rap mag, and done in rap character for GETHO FACTROAR.
And you can't see the video at the bottom? Make up your own mind.
I believeI just did...