Well, Michael Moore supports everything HE says with media sources aswell, so if this guy accuses him of bending the truth and falsifying evidence, then provides the same amount of evidence himself, what is to say he too is not lying?
Dude, where's my Country?
Because he's critiquing the book? Honestly...
Exactly, Kas.
He's a right-wing conversvative, who is critiquing a book that disagrees with everything he thinks.
Do you actually expect him to be nice and fair in his judgement?
He's a right-wing conversvative, who is critiquing a book that disagrees with everything he thinks.
Do you actually expect him to be nice and fair in his judgement?
The article says nothing about the writer's political affiliation.
Don't even give me that @#%$, Kas.
If he agreed with Moore, he wouldn't spend his time digging up references to contradict him. That means he disagrees with Moore, which probably makes him a right wing, conservative, republican, @#%$.
If you're going to run around screaming how Moore is bad and wrong, at least put some subtance behind your arguments.
If he agreed with Moore, he wouldn't spend his time digging up references to contradict him. That means he disagrees with Moore, which probably makes him a right wing, conservative, republican, @#%$.
If you're going to run around screaming how Moore is bad and wrong, at least put some subtance behind your arguments.
So, because he pointed out inaccuracies in Moore's works, he's a right wing conservative republican who hates the man...
Perhaps he's a Democrat who doesn't like liars?
Perhaps he's a Democrat who doesn't like liars?
You hit the nail on the head with that one, Kas.
Most people don't run around pointing out all the "inaccuracies" made by someone they support.
Most people don't run around pointing out all the "inaccuracies" made by someone they support.
So, because most people shove the mistakes and lies under the carpet because the perpetrator is someone they support, you assume this man is a right-wing conservative?
Exactly.
Kas, listen carefully. You don't like Michael Moore because his views are different from yours. So, whenever he is mentioned, you yank about the old "He's a liar!" line and shove it in people's faces.
It's not an assumption, it's simply the fact that those who disagree with someone are the most likely to write an 'review' that tries to tear them apart. Just like those who support someone are more likely to gloss over those things.
And by the way, Kas, of a book with hundreds of points and hundreds of back-up sources, people have only been able to contradict a select few. But that seems to be enough for you to dismiss everything the man says.
Kas, listen carefully. You don't like Michael Moore because his views are different from yours. So, whenever he is mentioned, you yank about the old "He's a liar!" line and shove it in people's faces.
It's not an assumption, it's simply the fact that those who disagree with someone are the most likely to write an 'review' that tries to tear them apart. Just like those who support someone are more likely to gloss over those things.
And by the way, Kas, of a book with hundreds of points and hundreds of back-up sources, people have only been able to contradict a select few. But that seems to be enough for you to dismiss everything the man says.