Not a rule, Kas, but a lack thereof. You could claim that since the enemy never posted the mines firing, it never happened (and so on).

Though if you'll read the IC thread, I did assume the mines would open fire on my forces, utilizing their basic programming to lock onto the largest target in range and shoot until a) they got new orders, b) the target was disabled, or c) they were destroyed.

I'm not that cheap.

Drayson you can't continue a thread when there are arguments going on. At least your last post will to be ignored.

Go ahead and ignore it, Jan. Your failure to respond will simply result another post from me. There are no arguments going on - only you whining that what we're doing is unfair.

Understand this, Jan. Everything we've done thus far has been completely within the rules. It is your failure to reply - and only that - which has lead to your current disposition.

Your latest post is not within the rules, because there was the argument going on. Even if that argument was finished, you would have needed to wait 72 hours after the completion of said argument.

Okay, Jan asked me to jump in this thread...

I am going to ask one member from each side to present which issues they would like a ruling on. Please, one member from each side.

TNO needs no ruling. The GC has failed to respond in the alloted time, and have suffered for it. It is my belief that the damages they have sustained are entirely fair for the situation, and that they have no excuse for not responding.

I have asked Anhk to make a ruling, and as you will notice he was suggesting a compromise in this earlier. He said he will look at it.

So am I to assume the only issue is that Drayson posted without your post, and you feel his post is illegal and his damages excessive?

The GC was given the full 72 hour allotment, and more. If the damages are deemed exsessive, I will edit them. However, as the GC failed to respond after three posts, I consider said damages entirely fair.

I will take that into consideration.

Do you have any issues with GC's conduct in the thread? Other than their lack of?