I think...
Posts: 37
  • Posted On: Oct 20 2004 9:35am
I think TNO should build be able to build MC80a in their yards because the Imperials did capture two MC80a before the Battle of Endor. The two MC80a names are the Knight and the Link. People would know about that if they played TIE Fighter game. Ok, What do you think about this, that this is open to any one to comment about it.
Posts: 7745
  • Posted On: Oct 20 2004 2:33pm
I'm certain there is more than enough canon and IC evidence of the Empire capturing planets, ships, and scientists for them to build most all craft in the EU. Whether they want to or not is a different story.
Posts: 1772
  • Posted On: Oct 20 2004 4:01pm
Why should we care about this?
Posts: 2788
  • Posted On: Oct 20 2004 4:52pm
Who said they can't build MCs?
Posts: 1584
  • Posted On: Oct 20 2004 7:04pm
LOL LOL


If you do not see any MC-80's in TNO's ship manifests rest be assured, it is because they don't want any. And Hyfe is right, who said they couldn't?
Posts: 4025
  • Posted On: Oct 20 2004 7:39pm
Who would want MC-80s? Maybe for deception, nothing more.
Posts: 455
  • Posted On: Oct 20 2004 10:30pm
They aren't great. Star Destroyers are much better.
Posts: 2462
  • Posted On: Oct 20 2004 11:39pm
TNO can do whatever it wants. We own.
Posts: 37
  • Posted On: Oct 21 2004 12:01am
Ok, think about the technologies on the MC80a like the shield domes which they are better than Imperial ones.
Posts: 5387
  • Posted On: Oct 21 2004 12:05am
All canon evidence tells us that the MC-90 Cruisers are equal or greater then the ISD.

But then again TNO has moved way beyond the ISD.

But then again, who gives a fuck? What is the point of this thread? TNO has TRF's chief admin at the helm, it's safe to say that if they really wanted to make a death star that can fit into a man's anus and then grow to full size with only a glass of water, no one could stop them. Maybe they don't build the MC-90 because it doesn't make sense?