Group Merger Request
Posts: 1913
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 5:53pm
i agree with dolash, for all its worth.

Uh... and though 'The gungan jedi' was GOING to be GC/ORS related, it definately isnt now.
Posts: 2453
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 7:28pm
Dolash, Jan isn't captured. He somehow managed to escape the Viscount when I was removed from command of the first fleet(voluntarily removed).

Also, I think this is a very important step for GC, and I feel the merger should go on. And if the staff makes sure GC members are active and not Farfelen, then that is an obvious attempt at being biased.

Also, if the staff can revoke the permission that they gave us for us to merge, then they can revoke the same permission from BDE/Farfelen, because Farfelen's members are obviously not active.
Posts: 699
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 8:57pm
Need I remind you how the Galactic Coalition came to be? So STFU. Thx.
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 9:18pm
Kyric Zen I did not mean that confrontationally.

However I was not here when the Galactic Coalition "began" so it would be more of an enlightening.

My apologies if my last post came off as hostile.
Posts: 2453
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 9:34pm
I think the reason the staff gave our groups special privileges because they made the rule about there being a limit to the amount of groups in each category, and there were too many in the Lightside category, so they found an easy way to reduce that number. There is no need like that for BDE and Farfelen to merge.

Also, GC has two of our members active, while you had one.
Posts: 699
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 9:35pm
You'd better be appologetic.

I definately have two active members. And this different, you are combining 32 total planets to our five.
Posts: 2453
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 10:04pm
As far as planets goes, that just means that we have been more active in taking planets, and you can't punish us for that.
Posts: 699
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 10:05pm
No, but I am making an generally inactive group become more active. Can't punish me for that.
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 11:18pm
As far as I see it, this should be allowed to go on. GC was allowed to form because of the newly implemented numbers of groups per side rule. That's why they were given special permission. So don't use that arguement.

This merger will benifit both groups and should be allowed to go on. We're all active members as you can see. Whether or not the RP's are group related should not matter. What matters is that we are indeed active in the roleplay area.
Posts: 2377
  • Posted On: Jan 4 2004 11:28pm
Uh, no.



So, really, what was the point of all this? You just admitted right there, Jan, that I was right. What was all that "Gash you are an idiot ." horse @#%$, huh? You shouldn't even be asking for this huge merger to take place when you KNOW that you don't have the members.