Recent Posts by Michael Raven
|
Imperial-class Star Destroyers (Mark I, II, and III) incorrect entries.
— Nov 26 2007 12:53am
Posted in the OOC Discussion forum at TRF Proper, started on Nov 25 2007 7:35pm
I'm not most people. :P Currently working on arranging my faction's forces and writing a ground force desposition along w |
|
Imperial-class Star Destroyers (Mark I, II, and III) incorrect entries.
— Nov 25 2007 9:23pm
Posted in the OOC Discussion forum at TRF Proper, started on Nov 25 2007 7:35pm
EMPEROR'S BANE! YOU THROW OUT ISD Is?!? YOU FIEND! :PAll joking aside, that's well and dandy, I just figured that I'd jum |
|
Imperial-class Star Destroyers (Mark I, II, and III) incorrect entries.
— Nov 25 2007 8:23pm
Posted in the OOC Discussion forum at TRF Proper, started on Nov 25 2007 7:35pm
Affirmative, I have noticed that. I just read the ISD entry and a few red flags raised in my head. If the 'Empire' here w |
|
Imperial-class Star Destroyers (Mark I, II, and III) incorrect entries.
— Nov 25 2007 8:05pm
Posted in the OOC Discussion forum at TRF Proper, started on Nov 25 2007 7:35pm
I am new here, and noticed the discrepencies; figured I would attempt to see them corrected.I believe that should be the |
|
Imperial-class Star Destroyers (Mark I, II, and III) incorrect entries.
— Nov 25 2007 7:35pm
Posted in the OOC Discussion forum at TRF Proper, started on Nov 25 2007 7:35pm
1. As of the completion of the first actual Imperial I-class Star Destroyer, the name was solidified as Imperial-class; t |