XP Gackt, help ?
Posts: 167
  • Posted On: Feb 26 2007 5:33am
1.the alliance and the treaty( the triple entente and the triple allaince)
2.how world war one ended and the causes

I have this assignment due for next Sunday and I have to summarize those two in two different paragraphs and they're supposed to be short but with a lot of the basic info. ;.;

Can anyone help me with this ? Since you guys appear to be oh-so smart and stuff. :P

Ah, I remember the days when I asked you guys for help with my debate homework.
Posts: 2453
  • Posted On: Feb 26 2007 5:39am
I remember that day too. It was funny. I'll skip worrying about answering your question because no doubt Telan and Kraken will come in and possibly tell me I'm wrong.
Posts: 5711
  • Posted On: Feb 26 2007 5:39am
Are you trying to TRF(cheat) your homework?
Posts: 2453
  • Posted On: Feb 26 2007 5:40am
Who would do that Beef? No one!

*cough*anyonewanttowritemychildandyouthstudiesessayoutlineforme*cough*
Posts: 462
  • Posted On: Feb 26 2007 5:43am
The Triple Entente, The Triple Alliance, WWI Causes, How WWI ended. The internet is your friend, use it.
Posts: 5711
  • Posted On: Feb 26 2007 5:49am
I'm going to burn you alive, Circe.

There is not a single institution dedicated to higher learning, not a single education facility that will support or endorse the use of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a fine source of introductory material however, in any paper; one will want to support their claims with published, documented facts and Wikipedia simply don't count.

Otherwise, all good.
Posts: 167
  • Posted On: Feb 26 2007 5:51am
The internet. BAH. XO

All those damn summaries are too long. Tried em'. :P

And am I cheating ?

...

;)
Posts: 462
  • Posted On: Feb 26 2007 5:58am
I know that, but it contains enough basic information to write a paragraph summary.
Posts: 167
  • Posted On: Feb 26 2007 6:05am
Thanks a bunch !
I'm done. :D

And the internet is for porn. >>;

Oh, and it seems my teacher is rather fond of wikipedia.
Posts: 5711
  • Posted On: Feb 26 2007 6:16am
It's fine to be fond of Wikipedia. It's fine to use it as a tool.

It's wrong to cite it in support of a statment as, more often then not, Wikipedia entries do not substantiate themselves academically.

Chemical bondage rules.