Windows Vista
Posts: 359
  • Posted On: Feb 21 2007 5:21am
(shurgs)in all my years of using windows, I've never had a problem, not one virus, or crashs, its always been stable for me.

all the security is horribly exaggerated. It only comes on when I'm installing something new or moving some files, but after that it doesn't. So what's the big deal? you use up a few seconds before installing a program and never hear of it ever again after the install. To me that's nothing. Plus you can turn that secrity off and never worry about it.

Explorer works just like before. right click the start button and click on explorer and find all your programs there. I did from the first minute I loaded the OS. my learning curve was like 20 seconds
Posts: 1584
  • Posted On: Feb 21 2007 5:28am
haha you make very good points Rob, but if I were to pay hundreds of dollars for an OS (which I have to, I build my own computers... nothin but bad experiences from store bought varieties) then I demand perfection!


Absolute perfection! ;)



Hey shut up, I can dream.
Posts: 2462
  • Posted On: Feb 21 2007 5:33am
Rob Stellar
all the security is horribly exaggerated. It only comes on when I'm installing something new or moving some files, but after that it doesn't. So what's the big deal? you use up a few seconds before installing a program and never hear of it ever again after the install. To me that's nothing. Plus you can turn that secrity off and never worry about it.
Which must do wonders for your computers, er, security...

The problem I've heard raised time and time again with Vista's "Security" is that it asks you to approve something, but never actually tells you what you're approving. If you double click an .exe file, chances are you want it installed.

And all it requires is that you click "Accept". Contrast that to OSX, where the authentication dialog comes up when you're changing system settings or system files, and requires you to actually input your password.
Posts: 359
  • Posted On: Feb 21 2007 5:33am
haha you sure can dream ;). I build my own systems too by the way. It's the best way to go :)

Yeah, I unno, I've used OSX and didn't really care for it. its just my prefrance. I've never really been a fan or mac. They have good ideas though and vista borrows for some of them wish makes it even better. I unno, I never had prob with it. I keep my security up and never had trouble.
Posts: 551
  • Posted On: Feb 21 2007 5:40am
My only comment about Vista is I hate those fucking ads that come and eat half my screen everytime I try to check the news.
Posts: 2558
  • Posted On: Feb 21 2007 5:42am
ZoneAlarm.

Know it. Love it.

And you can't build drivers off of specs. You need the code they use.
Posts: 2788
  • Posted On: Feb 21 2007 11:57am
Holding out as long as I can. I do plan on building a new rig in the spring though, with the intent of it being a somewhat high-end gaming rig, and I'd like DX10 support when I do get it pieced together and the new compatible games (UT 2007, Crysis, BioShock, etc) finally come out. That'll require a Vista upgrade I suppose.
Posts: 2558
  • Posted On: Feb 21 2007 3:57pm
If memory serves there's only one DX10 card on the market right now. Or at least like 2 weeks after the release however long ago that was *has lost all track of time*. Hopefully that'll improve for the spring, but still.
Posts: 179
  • Posted On: Feb 21 2007 11:53pm
The Irtarded
ZoneAlarm.

Know it. Love it.

And you can't build drivers off of specs. You need the code they use.
Zone Alarm used to be good but it now utter shit, much like Norton and Mcafee. NOD32 and AVG are both far superior, particularly NOD32. The Windows Firewall is better than Zone Alarm.
And you can't build drivers off of specs. You need the code they use.
You need the specs, and you need a test environment, but you certainly don't need the code. You need to follow the very technical spec of the driver model and the associate APIs your driver will talk to.
Which must do wonders for your computers, er, security...

The problem I've heard raised time and time again with Vista's "Security" is that it asks you to approve something, but never actually tells you what you're approving. If you double click an .exe file, chances are you want it installed.

And all it requires is that you click "Accept". Contrast that to OSX, where the authentication dialog comes up when you're changing system settings or system files, and requires you to actually input your password.
I sort of agree with this. It does tell you which file is asking to perform which action, but I do prefer it was more like MacOS X or *NIX. SUDO would be nice for the elevated security.

lmao! thats the funniest thing I've heard so far this year!
Really? XP is pretty decent, with the exception of the security model. A wide range of hardware and software are well supported. The environment itself is very stable. I see no issue with calling it "Solid"
  • Posted On: Feb 22 2007 12:25am
much like Norton


Gasp! Blasphemy!

*Powers up and blows Morgan away*

And Sir Sethet, what do you find troubling with Windows XP?