I feel for all that has had to deal with terror attacks. For those of us in the US and England we don't get hit with this kind of thing often, but we all have brothers and sisters that deal with this on a day to day basis, please keep peace in all your prayers. My heart goes out to all the victims, their families, friends and pets.
Depends on your definition of "often". England has a lengthy history of IRA bombings. One reason, no doubt, they were able to respond so well to this attack.
That being said, my condolences to the victims. The purposeful targetting of innocent people is the most disgusting form of "warfare".
I feel for all that has had to deal with terror attacks. For those of us in the US and England we don't get hit with this kind of thing often, but we all have brothers and sisters that deal with this on a day to day basis, please keep peace in all your prayers. My heart goes out to all the victims, their families, friends and pets.
why does everything have to be about a collective consciousness that no longer exists, and maybe never did? modernity has sequestered everything. the 21st century isn't about identity, it's about anonymity. it's interesting that when sandra day o'connor stepped down the media obsession was social issues, but those are foregone conclusions. the legal battles to come for the next several decades will be about privacy. national identity is a dead concept when you have the option (and popular option) not to buy into it. its corpse is paraded about when bombs go off but it spends the rest of its time six feet underground in a bunker with elvis and shit that disappears in the bermuda triangle.
if that weren't true, the bombers would not have been british. and many of britain's most famous exports would not be heroes of the counterculture. think the sex pistols, think radiohead. the culture of the new world is the antithesis of the old. it is a culture of being alone in a crowd of other people -- a culture where your country is a collection of people who just happen to live on the same plot of land.
every nation that steps through the fire of technology, science, modernism and secularism emerges on the other side without nationalism, and without the sort of bullshit masturbatory collectivism that people like to pretend exists because it looks good on tv. history is dead. winston churchill is dead. shakespeare, chaucer, darwin, newton. dead dead dead dead. they all belong to a concept that plainly does not exist anymore. anyone who believes the inverse is clinging to the security blanket of a generation that is already dying and receding from power.
and if for short periods of time it appears i am wrong, wait one week and turn on the television and tell me it hasn't evaporated. because you are mistaking shared sentimentality for a collective identity, like the americans did when things started exploding on their doorstep. it goes away.
You're quite wrong, you know. You've confused solidarity with national identidy. Americans (for example) by and large are proud to be American. Even those who disagree with their leaders are proud of the country, and the principles it was founded on. Not universally, obviously, but basing your argument on the idea of "100% of the population does not think this way, therefor it is wrong" is a ridiculous point. Whether Britain's national identidy (so to speak) is being shouted from the rooftops, as it has been in the wake of the bombings, or whether it is lying just beneath the surface, it is no less present. An attack does not bring out this collective identidy, it just makes it apparent to those elsewhere (like us).
Certainly, Britain's most 'famous' exports are examples of the supposed counter-culture. But you know what? That very counter-culture requires a strong culture to exist! By definition the counter-culture is merely opposition to the culture - so for the counter-culture to be popular, so must the culture be strong. Otherwise there would be no counter-culture, the Sex Pistols would have had nothing to rebel against.
Yes, Winston Churchill is dead. Thank you for pointing that out. But he is still seen around the world as a hero. Churchill's death is irrelevent, his symbol and what he stood for live on. Especcially when something like this happens.
Universal agreement will never happen, I agree. And a changing world alters national identidy significantly as time goes on. But there is always an identidy somewhere that people can buy into.