Sorry to break a sort of 'political cease-fire' that's been in effect since some time after Gash left, but this is just... I mean... I don't even live in American and it makes ME angry just to read it. Since I doubt many of you have a subscription to the New York Times website, I've reposted the story here and also have a link to where I got it from:
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/index.php?id=2231
In short, what this seems to mean is a load of quasi-religious/Political leaders and the like are banding together in an effort to quash political opposition to their most conservative judges, in an effort to reverse thirty years of American history.
No offence, but am I the only one seeing America go backwards? All of the most advanced and civilized nations are far and away ahead of where America is now in regards to, say, gay rights or 'moral issues' (which many of the things claimed to be are not).
Politically, Bush has done pretty well moving America that way. There has been a lot of cuts to social programs, enviromental programs, not to mention dropping out of international treaties and accords (Kyoto, for example), the sort of things that did not exist in the past and - it appears - will no longer do so in the future.
But I guess the law - not the last bastion of 'radical liberalism' but of honest human progression - is a little tougher to change. Wheras a majority is all that is needed to immeadietly begin converting a nation politically and socially, legally it is a much lengthlier process of nominations, confirmations, debate, and very long terms.
I don't want to be ranty, however, I want to debate, and thus it is important for me to say right now I do not blame - nor do I hold anything against - the majority of American people. Most people are just regular people, and they are moulded by their leaders and heroes etc. If America had powerful, progressive, liberal-leaning leaders who could really reach out and rally people, those same people who are hoping Bush can appoint new judges to get rid of the horrors that are gay people, abortion, and the lack of bibles in classrooms could probably be the sort worried for the state of the environment and national health, and not caring about things like sexual preference in regards to marriage.
Simply put, if this goes through, there will no longer by any power in the hands of a minority. Democracy should not just be the will of the majority but also the protection of the minority as well, and without any chance of opposition whatsoever - the Judiciary stacked in their favour, a futile opposition party, determined but otherwise useless attackers hanging on the fringe of politics - this will turn America into a defacto one-party state, not a true democracy at all. It is only the 'will of the people' if the people are informed, not manipulated, and they can only be informed if both sides can really be heard.
As a Canadian, I know I will never be really affected by this. Despite the jokes, America will never invade Canada - it's simply not efficient. And any 'rub-off' effect of American ideology will be counterbalanced by anti-American sentiments. Economically we might be affected a tad depending on how America operates, but overall the effect should be slight. It is as a Human that I am saddened by this move, the sight of a nation that has built itself into a complicated web of beliefs and rules and systems apparently losing its' last few threads connected to the Democracy, equality, and freedom for which it has often tried to stand for.
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/index.php?id=2231
In short, what this seems to mean is a load of quasi-religious/Political leaders and the like are banding together in an effort to quash political opposition to their most conservative judges, in an effort to reverse thirty years of American history.
No offence, but am I the only one seeing America go backwards? All of the most advanced and civilized nations are far and away ahead of where America is now in regards to, say, gay rights or 'moral issues' (which many of the things claimed to be are not).
Politically, Bush has done pretty well moving America that way. There has been a lot of cuts to social programs, enviromental programs, not to mention dropping out of international treaties and accords (Kyoto, for example), the sort of things that did not exist in the past and - it appears - will no longer do so in the future.
But I guess the law - not the last bastion of 'radical liberalism' but of honest human progression - is a little tougher to change. Wheras a majority is all that is needed to immeadietly begin converting a nation politically and socially, legally it is a much lengthlier process of nominations, confirmations, debate, and very long terms.
I don't want to be ranty, however, I want to debate, and thus it is important for me to say right now I do not blame - nor do I hold anything against - the majority of American people. Most people are just regular people, and they are moulded by their leaders and heroes etc. If America had powerful, progressive, liberal-leaning leaders who could really reach out and rally people, those same people who are hoping Bush can appoint new judges to get rid of the horrors that are gay people, abortion, and the lack of bibles in classrooms could probably be the sort worried for the state of the environment and national health, and not caring about things like sexual preference in regards to marriage.
Simply put, if this goes through, there will no longer by any power in the hands of a minority. Democracy should not just be the will of the majority but also the protection of the minority as well, and without any chance of opposition whatsoever - the Judiciary stacked in their favour, a futile opposition party, determined but otherwise useless attackers hanging on the fringe of politics - this will turn America into a defacto one-party state, not a true democracy at all. It is only the 'will of the people' if the people are informed, not manipulated, and they can only be informed if both sides can really be heard.
As a Canadian, I know I will never be really affected by this. Despite the jokes, America will never invade Canada - it's simply not efficient. And any 'rub-off' effect of American ideology will be counterbalanced by anti-American sentiments. Economically we might be affected a tad depending on how America operates, but overall the effect should be slight. It is as a Human that I am saddened by this move, the sight of a nation that has built itself into a complicated web of beliefs and rules and systems apparently losing its' last few threads connected to the Democracy, equality, and freedom for which it has often tried to stand for.