Did the thought ever occur to you that people LIED about who they voted for when they where asked?

Exit polls are unreliable, that's why many people don't trust them.

Drayson, not to be a jerk or anything, but this guy is easily identifiable as a hard-core Democrat. He's just a bitter, sore loser, in my opinon.

THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT. STOP WHINING, GET OVER IT, GO HOME.

The election in Ohio was not decided by the voters but by something called "spoilage." Typically in the United States, about 3 percent of the vote is voided, just thrown away, not recorded. When the bobble-head boobs on the tube tell you Ohio or any state was won by 51 percent to 49 percent, don't you believe it ... it has never happened in the United States, because the total never reaches a neat 100 percent. The television totals simply subtract out the spoiled vote.

Expert statisticians investigating spoilage for the government calculated that 54 percent of the ballots thrown in the dumpster were cast by black folks.

Spoilage has a very Democratic look in New Mexico. Hispanic voters in the Enchanted State, who voted more than two to one for Kerry, are five times as likely to have their vote spoil as a white voter. Counting these uncounted votes would easily overtake the Bush 'plurality.'

I for one believe that if 100% of the country turned out to vote and 100% of the votes counted, Kerry would win. I believe that Bush's victory, assuming it was legitimate, was based on more GOP supporters turning up to vote, not on the will of the majority of the American people.

Exit poll's have and always will be inaccurate when people give the wrong information.

The fact that you think you're right proves it, you think everyone will give accurate information when they are asked who they voted for... tell me, why should I tell someone who I voted for when it isn't any of there god forsaken business?

I can tell you flat out, that a lot of republicans who voted for Bush, told those people that they voted for Kerry. I know I did, and so did a lot of my friend's.

We had a few of those at our polling station. It happens when people decide they like all the candidates, so they select every one on the ballot.

Translated: People specializing in making numbers dance to their tune guessed what color someone's skin was based upon how many holes they improperly punched.

Are they putting webcams in the voting booths these days?

If legit, it is the will of the people. Your will doesn't count if you're too lazy to vote, sorry.

Ok, so this is what I get out of the article: Black and Hispanic democrats are too stupid to punch the card all the way.

That's about what he's saying, isn't it? The 'problem areas' are highly populated with democratic-voting minorities.

That is, though, not what the author is talking about. For you to know that people punched every hole you have to have looked at the ballot (and presumably you would record the number of ballots). He's talking about ballots that are simply thrown out without being looked at.

Way to change the subject, though.

What about people who weren't able to make it? You know - people who have to work two minimum wage jobs to support their children, who can't afford to wait in line all day because they need the money. Or people who were forced to cast uncounted provisional ballots for any number of reasons. Their votes don't count either, I guess?

Congratulations, Kas! You're officially a racist! If I believed you were stupid enough to actually get that out of the article, I might not be inclined to believe you a racist... but you're clearly intelligent enough to know what the author was talking about. You just prefer to turn it into a racial thing instead of actually considering that he might have a point.