I admit, I don't want to swallow it either. The idea of the GOP successfully stealing two elections in a row is a disheartening thouht, to say the least. But this makes for an interesting read, and while I don't share quite the confidence the author does, he does raise a VERY interesting point about the exit poles...
Another freaking stolen election. Its interesting to see a one-party system. Republicans control every federal government thingy, apparently with at least a little bit of fraud on their side, and the odds of this changing any time soon are small.
Has anyone considered the fact that maybe, just maybe, the fact that the voters who 'turned out in droves' weren't all Democrats? It is reported that this last election had a rather record turnout; 60% of the voting population from what I've read came out and voted. It seems like your thinking this 'record turnout' means automatically more votes for Kerry.
And that is true to a degree. A large portion of the 18-24 demographic are/were for Kerry, but you see, those kids weren't the only ones showing up to cast their vote. As was said in another thread, the senior voter turnout was very strong as well. The amount of people was increased significantly, and it is my belief that many moderates came out of the woodwork, weighed their options, and as I said before chose the lesser of two evils.
As an aside - In my opinion, there are many more moderates than people think there are; they just simply choose to remain under the radar, so to speak. And frankly, I'm usually one of them. I don't like to be associated with insane nutjob right-wingers - those lot are just far too radical for me. And I'm pretty sure that the same goes for others as well; Democrat and Republican moderates alike. Nobody likes to be prejudged, or to have their actions misconstrued and thought of as something done simply because they have chosen to register with one party or another. They registered with the party of their choice because they felt that that certain party held some of the same ideals they do. That being said though, why don't they just register as indepentants? Well, it's really their choice to register how they want to.
Of course it's been considered. But you didn't refute any of the author's points - you just asked a question.
Certainly, it's possible Bush won legitimately. With gay marriage bans on 11 ballots, GOP supporters would be encouraged to show up. And a lot of work went into getting the religious right to come out and vote.
I for one believe that if 100% of the country turned out to vote and 100% of the votes counted, Kerry would win. I believe that Bush's victory, assuming it was legitimate, was based on more GOP supporters turning up to vote, not on the will of the majority of the American people.
And I believe that within two years a bad case of buyer's remorse will set in for the American people who did vote for Bush. Bush's actions effect everyone - not just Democrats.
One of my friends is 100% pleased that Bush won, because he feels it means that there will never be another Republican in the White House. And with Bush knowing he'll never face another election, and with a majority in the House and the Senate, who knows what the next four years will hold?
Oh not to worry, I'm not so naive as to think Bush's actions affect only Democrats. As for refuting the article, my personal opinion is that it's a reactionary piece of literature in the same vein as being a sore loser. But see, that's just my own initial thought and first impression after reading it. Give me eight hours to think on it and I could very well have a more thought-out answer for you.
edit ~ To clarify, I say sore loser because I know I've done similar things in the past, and I've seen people around me do it as well.