Car Shopping
Posts: 4025
  • Posted On: Mar 11 2006 10:49pm
We got a truck today, Silverado Single Cab. Enough leg and head room, comfortable seats, radio, A/C, and automatic, it's brand new 2006, and I'll be paying 210 a month for it, plus another 100 for insurance, but that's right in our price range.
Posts: 7745
  • Posted On: Mar 11 2006 11:27pm
Thanks for the suggestions, Morgan. *bums his way over to carsoup*.

Yeah, I've never really gotten into anything fast. Fastest I've gone is sixty on my dirtbike, and ... one oh five in my Lumina. I think the Lumina is about nine seconds for a zero-sixty sprint.

Not a dragster.

edit: OH OH I once hit eighty on my snomobile. And that sucker's older than I am.
Posts: 179
  • Posted On: Mar 11 2006 11:58pm
Heh, I've gone over 140 in a friend's Firebird Trans Am, and bumped against the 115mph limiter in the 240SX for a few minutes driving to a rallycross event south of Orlando. The fastest accellerating car I've been in was probably Marcus's (DarthTurbogeek's) rally prepared Mitsubishi Galant VR-4. It had boost leaks at the time but when the turbo spooled dear almighty did it scoot like a terrified cheeta. One second it's a normal stripped out car with a cage and DEAR GOD HERE COMES THE SCENERY.

The cars I reccomended aren't really fast in a straight line, but they're all excellent cars and they all handle really well along with getting decent fuel economy. That was sort of what I was under the impression you wanted. If you link me whatever you come up with I can probably tell you which issues to look out for in that specific model.
Posts: 7745
  • Posted On: Mar 12 2006 12:09am
Carsoup spit this out at me for the Nissan. It's uh, only got a 2.4l. I know most power isn't just from the engine, the transmission ratios and whatnot are quite important, but that seems small to me.

I ran into a few BMD 3 series', my gosh it's those ugly things. My sister wants one because it looks cool, she says. It certainly screams 80's
Posts: 179
  • Posted On: Mar 12 2006 12:31am
I can't see any of your links, it just drops me into the "pick a region" page. :(
Try Autotrader, too.

The 240SX has a 6500RPM redline. First tops out at 30, 2nd winds just barely to 60 if you overrev slightly. Etc. 0-60 is about 8 seconds. The 2.4 liter inline 4 isn't going to win any awards but it's highly durable and puts out up to 155hp and 160 ft-lbs of torque, which is enough to move a car that only weighs 2600 (coupe) or 2680 (hatch) well enough.

The 3 series probably screams 80s because I think it was designed in 85 or so.

"Power" isn't everything. A Lotus Elise will spank everything short of an early 00s Corvette Z06. It "only" has 180hp. It also weighs 2000 lbs.
Posts: 7745
  • Posted On: Mar 12 2006 12:47am
Autotrader has something similar to what carsoup had here, Carsoup's 240SX was a hatchback though. I'm not too keen on a cloth covered convertable -- Minnesota winters are friggen' cold. But just to get a general idea...

But that 3 series, peppy little thing, yes? Some of the newer ones look a little more Euro than they do 80's, which isn't bad. If it's got a set of legs and came in a dark colour, black for instance I could be partial.
Posts: 7745
  • Posted On: Mar 12 2006 12:50am
*googles Lotus Elise*





*profanity*
Posts: 179
  • Posted On: Mar 12 2006 1:01am
That's an E36 (1992+). I was reccommending the E30 (80s model) because it would be in your budget. The 240SX convertibles are pretty rare but I deffinately would not get one in a winter state. They're also nowhere near as stiff as the coupe or hatch, which is a bad thing. The BMW 318 in the E36 chassis is completely gutless. Only look at a 325 or better.